Cookies on Plantwise Knowledge Bank

Like most websites we use cookies. This is to ensure that we give you the best experience possible.


Continuing to use means you agree to our use of cookies. If you would like to, you can learn more about the cookies we use.

Plantwise Knowledge Bank

Your search results

Species Page

greater club rush

Scirpus grossus
This information is part of a full datasheet available in the Crop Protection Compendium (CPC). Find out more information on how to access the CPC.
©CAB International. Published under a CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 licence.


You can pan and zoom the map
Save map
Select a dataset
Map Legends
  • CABI Summary Records
Map Filters
Third party data sources:

Host plants / species affected

Main hosts

show all species affected
Oryza sativa (rice)

List of symptoms / signs

Prevention and control

Integrated Weed Management

The management of S. grossus in ricefields and waterways has traditionally been herbicide based (Baki, 1981; Baki and Azmi, 1992). The integration of chemical control with other control options is minimal, with the exception of cultural control methods. A minor limitation in the use of herbicides to control S. grossus in ricefields or waterways has been the need to deal with a complex array of weed species, often in sympatric existence within a habitat. The need to suppress the population of S. grossus to below an acceptable threshold is often hampered by the need to suppress the population of other, more noxious species, namely Echinochloa species.

In the development of integrated weed management strategies for Scirpus, different control protocols may be harnessed to suppress the population below a threshold. Biological control of S. grossus has not been widely explored. In order to be effective, these control tactics require a thorough understanding of the ecology of both the crop and the weed (Waterhouse, 1993).

Cultural Control and Phytosanitary Methods

Proper tillage regimes and water management are effective in suppressing the population of S. grossus in rice. Invariably, 2-3 rounds of dry or wet rotovation followed by raking and the removal of stolon debris in direct-seeded or transplanted rice culture reduces S. grossus populations to below the economic threshold of 4-5 plants/m². The population of shoot nodules of S. grossus was depleted by slowly increasing the depth of inundation to 20 cm.

Increasing the seeding rate to 120 kg/ha in direct-seeded rice reduced the population of S. grossus and effectively maintained the weed population below an acceptable level.

Chemical Control

Due to the variable regulations around (de-)registration of pesticides, we are for the moment not including any specific chemical control recommendations. For further information, we recommend you visit the following resources:


S. grossus can cause severe losses to ricefields in Malaysia. Four to five plants/m² can inflict a yield loss of about 10-15% in the direct-seeded rice variety MR84. Keeping ricefields free of S. grossus within the first 30-40 days of the crop can alleviate such yield loss. In Indonesia and elsewhere in South-East Asia, southern China, tropical Australia and India, the weed is considered a species of minor importance (Holm et al., 1991).

S. grossus has some economic value. It serves as a good herbage when ploughed in as green manure. S. grossus var. kysoor, occurring in India and Malesia, produces tubers which are a good source of starch, containing about 62-79% digestible carbohydrates and 7.5-11.8% protein (Burkhill, 1966). S. grossus is also used in traditional medicine in the Indian subcontinent. In the Philippines and Perak state of Peninsular Malaysia, S. grossus is harvested for mat-making and string.